We never ask for quote contact details. No lead forms, no contractor ads—just numbers.

Scope dictionary · July 2026

Foundation repair methods, explained.

A method name is the beginning of a comparable scope—not a diagnosis, design or complete price. Use this guide to translate proposal language into measurable questions.

No. 01Direct answer

Method, unit and objective must travel together.

Foundation proposals often use a recognizable method name while leaving out the measurable scope. Before comparing price, ask what the method is intended to do, how much work is proposed, which unit controls the price and what remains excluded.

A familiar repair label can still hide a non-comparable scope.

A comparison diagram pairing repair methods with pricing units and scope questions.
Repair terminology becomes comparable when method, unit and scope question stay together.

No. 02Method dictionary

Seven terms worth translating.

i.

Limited crack repair

A bounded crack-repair scope. The proposal should state the material, preparation, accessible length and finish work—and must not use price alone to classify the crack.

ii.

Mudjacking or slabjacking

Material is introduced beneath a slab to lift or support a defined area. Ask for the area, material, void assumptions and intended objective.

iii.

Push or hydraulic piers

A driven support system commonly priced per installed pier. The system, layout, count, termination criteria and included site work should be written.

iv.

Helical piers

A screw-like support system with its own design and installation assumptions. Do not silently substitute a combined national pier range for a method-specific bid.

v.

Bowed-wall reinforcement

Carbon-fiber, steel or anchor-based proposals may use different units. Ask for wall length, number of strips, beams or anchors, preparation and water-management boundaries.

vi.

Underpinning

A broader structural scope that adds or extends support beneath an existing foundation. The term should resolve into a system, quantity, sequence and project boundary.

vii.

Foundation replacement

Temporary support, demolition and rebuilding of affected foundation elements. Utilities, waterproofing, inspections and restoration need explicit ownership.

No. 03Units

The unit tells you what can be compared.

i.

Per project

Useful only when two proposals describe the same bounded work, inclusions and restoration.

ii.

Per pier or item

Requires a documented system, quantity and definition of what installation includes.

iii.

Per wall section

Must define wall length and the number of strips, beams or anchors. A section is not automatically a single item.

No. 04Proposal test

A method is specific enough when you can answer:

01

What was observed?

Ask for documented conditions without treating a sales label as an independent structural conclusion.

02

What is the objective?

Stabilization, lifting, water management and finish repair are different outcomes.

03

What is measured?

Pier count, wall length, strip count, area or project boundary should make the quantity auditable.

04

What happens afterward?

Inspections, utility checks, cleanup, restoration and monitoring should not appear only after work starts.

The calculator estimates a method you select. It never selects the method for the house.

For a major structural commitment, consider review by an appropriately licensed professional who does not sell the repair.

No. 05Evidence

Method and technical references

  1. Source date 2024-01-01; verified 2026-07-26. Evidence class: official-code; family: icc. Technical context for foundations, soil, drainage and waterproofing. It does not publish repair-cost multipliers; local adoption varies.

  2. Source date 2024-01-01; verified 2026-07-26. Evidence class: official-code; family: icc. Technical context for underpinning design and sequencing. It does not publish repair-cost ranges.

  3. Source date 2026-03-06; verified 2026-07-26. Evidence class: editorial-market-data; family: angi-homeadvisor. Editorial presentation derived from Angi cost data. It is not an independent price-data family.

  4. Source date 2026-02-06; verified 2026-07-27. Evidence class: market-data; family: homeguide. Independent proprietary cost-database comparison. Several scopes differ from the runtime claims, so overlap alone does not make a range supported.

For prices, units and evidence grades, use the full foundation cost guide.

No. 06Questions

Foundation repair method FAQ

What are the main foundation repair methods?

Common proposal terms include limited crack repair, slabjacking, push or hydraulic piers, helical piers, bowed-wall reinforcement, underpinning and full replacement. These labels describe work categories; they do not establish which method a property needs.

Are helical piers and push piers the same?

No. They are different support systems even when both are priced per installed pier. Ask the proposal to identify the system, design assumptions, layout, quantity and included work.

Does wall reinforcement fix a water problem?

Do not assume it does. Structural reinforcement, crack repair, drainage and waterproofing are separate scopes unless the proposal explicitly combines and itemizes them.

Can a cost calculator choose a repair method?

No. The calculator estimates a method and quantity selected by the user. It does not inspect the property, determine a cause or design a repair.